In my last post titled Business As Usual I linked to an article in the Inquirer where former justice secretary Franklin Drilon was quoted as saying “Alibi is the weakest defense”, referring to Justice Secretary Alberto Agra's April 16 decision to clear two members of the Ampatuan clan in the Maguindanao massacre. Today, after assessing new evidence, it looks like Agra agrees.
The new evidence includes the testimony of a new witness claiming both participated in a meeting the night before the massacre. According to the witness, in this meeting a decision was taken to stop the Mangudadatus from filing a certificate of candidacy.
The new witness corroborates the testimony of Kenny Dalandag, who was the first witness to testify Zaldy and his cousin, Akmad, attended said meeting. Both are now in protective custody of the NBI.
Some will be asking whether Agra's decision today had more to do with the collective backlash he endured after his April 16 decision, rather than the new evidence coming to light. Whatever the motivation, it is good news that justice will get a chance to dig further into the truth, which is excellent news for democracy.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
as one of my Professors and constitutionalist Florin Hilbay says: the power of collective outrage, so important in democracies, at work.
As Sen Drilon says, alibi is the weakest defense, not only must you prove that the alibi is true, but that it was physically IMPOSSIBLE for the person to be there at the time the crime (or planning) happened...Agra didn't need the presence of two new witnesses, he only needed to go back to the basic rules of evidence!
Post a Comment